Author Topic: Request for Directing the First Best Notice

Offline Pastuh

  • Administrator
  • *
Request for Directing the First Best Notice
« on: July 08, 2020, 02:35:19 PM »
  • Quote (selected)
  • {
    Translation from Russian into English
    of the extraction from the Transcribed text
    of the request originally in verbal form in Russian language.
    }

    Case No. 16-md-02752-lhk,
    "Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation",
    United States District Court Northern District of California
    San Jose Division,
    Lucy H. Koh, United States District Judge.


    Dear Honorable Judge Lucy H. Koh,

    This request required adding the following Definitions
    (in addition to Definitions in other requests from Pastuh)
    for clarity:
    {
    "WORLDWIDE" - presumable territory of the planet Earth
                  inhabited by HEBREWs, including the putative
                  Settlement Class Members numbered by item 14 (1)
                  of the Order 390 in Russian, English, Spanish
                                      languages originally,
                  in strict fulfillment of the Order 390.

    "Heffler" - Settlement Administrator, Heffler Claims Group.

    The "Only Notice Expert" - Ms. Jeanne Finegan,
                               President and Chief Media Officer
                               of HF Media, LLC, Inc. ("HF Media")
                                            a division of Heffler,
                               in summary, the only Notice Expert
                               accredited in Public Relations (APR)
                               by the Universal Accreditation Board,
                               a program administered by
                               the Public Relations Society of America.

    "False Declaration" - Document 330-7 Filed 10/22/18,
              DECLARATION OF JEANNE C. FINEGAN, APR CONCERNING
              PROPOSED NOTICE TO SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS,
              published (in English only) on the Settlement WebSite
              instead of expected Chutzpah Declaration
                      updated within the UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT set.

    "Chutzpah Declaration" - Document 369-6 Filed 04/09/19,
              DECLARATION OF JEANNE C. FINEGAN, APR CONCERNING
              PROPOSED NOTICE TO SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS.

    "CHUTSPAH" - ~Carefully Hidden in Underground
                  Truthful Secret Proposals (Predictions, Prophecies)
                  Approved by Humans~
                  (in oppose to the cynical Chutzpah, usually public).

    "UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT" - a set of documents
                        in all languages promised by Heffler
             of the AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
                    in updated Editions
                and of the updated Editions of its Exhibitions,
             accessible to Heffler,
             but not published at the Settlement Website
                 before the Announcement of the end of the second round
                                         of testing the Notice Program,
             being a sort of CHUTSPAH, particularly in part of the universal
                   criteria of certification of the settlement class
                   in all related corresponding documents,
                   coinciding, in essence, with the quote of
                   the universal criteria published in section "Yahoo! Inc.
                       Customer Data Security Breach Litigation Settlement"
                       on the updated page of the common Heffler's site
                       ( https://www.hefflerclaims.com/active-cases/ )
                   (originally) : "If you had a Yahoo account
                           between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016,
                           you are a settlement class member.
                    If you received an emailed notice
                           from the settlement administrator
                           about this class action settlement
                    addressed to you,
                    then the settlement administrator has already determined
                                      that you are a settlement class member.",

                    satisfactory for the first round of testing
                                             the Notice Program
                    up to the date of consideration of the Request
                                      for Directing the First Best Notice.

    "DECLARATION OF IMPLEMENTATION" - DECLARATION OF JEANNE C. FINEGAN, APR
                 CONCERNING IMPLEMENTATION OF NOTICE
                 TO SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS, Document 414-1 Filed 01/31/20,
                 filed in the beginning of a second round of testing
                 the Notice Program, before the end of the planned directing
                     of the improved Notices between January 27, 2020
                                                till February 9, 2020
                            from the settlement administrator
                            to the last known e-mail addresses
                            of the rest of holders of accounts
                               compromised during the Yahoo Data Breaches
                               (all three billion accounts then existing
                                                               WORLDWIDE)
                            after the preliminary attempt of malicious actors
                            in the first round of testing the Notice Program
                               to steal from HEBREWs in calculation
                                  of the Noticed Settlement Class Members
                               the 942,628,667 accounts
                               on behalf of the residents
                                  of the United States of America and Israel,
                            hopefully having failed due to the inconsistency
                                                       of the Notice Program
                            but perfectness of the Honorable Judge
                                at least within the period 40 days
                                (between January 27, 2020 and March 6, 2020)
                                noticeably less than originally foreseen period
                                for opt-outs and objections
                                from the victims of the first round of testing -
                                230-45=185 days.
    }.


    Hereby I request the Honorable Judge,
    (1)
           pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23(c)(1)(C):
           "Altering or Amending the Order.
            An order that grants or denies class certification
            may be altered or amended before final judgment.", -
    to embrace by the quote signs the content of item 14 (1)
       in the original Order 390 in Russian language,
              as presumably the main language
              on current stage of the litigation since this request,
    and to add after the resulted quote
           the incoming link, embraced by brackets,
               leading from item 11 of the PROPOSED ORDER 369-15
                                     in Russian language edition
               as from the original source of the quote resulted;
    (2)
    and then to amend similarly the documents Order 390
             in other languages (English, Spanish, Arabic, Hebrew
                  and two additional languages like, on the discretion,
                                               Korean and Vietnamese), -
        as the multilingual Teaching examples from the Honorable Judge
               for the Only Notice Expert
               and for Heffler
               and for the Lead Settlement Class Counsel
               and for the Yahoo Counsel
               and for other attorneys and interested participants,
                                     not excluding PSEUDO-SHARPERs;
    (3)
    and afterwards to suggest the Only Notice Expert,
        to add similarly into item 11 of the Chutzpah Declaration,
           thus assisting to reveal the source of Chutzpah
                                     in Chutzpah Declaration, -
        the corresponding incoming link, leading from the item
        of Yahoo Counsel's document, by which Yahoo Counsel
        informed the Only Notice Expert, judging on item 11 itself, that
           "approximately 900 million to one billion Yahoo accounts,
            representing up to 200 million unique U.S. and Israeli residents,
            were affected by the Data Breaches occurring in 2013 and 2014,
            and that were announced in September 2016, November 2016,
                                    December 2016, and September 2017,
            as well as to data security intrusions
               occurring in January 2012 (the "Data Breaches")."
        in reply to the corresponding request of the Only Notice Expert,
                                      yet unknown, -
        for implementation of the direct outreach via email
            with such a suspicious redefined special term ~Data Breaches~, -
            in contradiction to the definition of the terms
               "Yahoo Data Breaches" and "Data Breaches."
                           (with the final dot within the term),
               hidden from the eyes of the readers of the Agreement 369-2
                                                at the Settlement Website
               in footnote 2 at page 3 to item 6 at pages 2, 3
               in the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
                      (Document 387-4 Filed 07/11/19)
                  (yet not published for PSEUDO-SHARPERs
                   at the Settlement Website in corresponding languages) :
               "*2 The 2012 Intrusions, 2013 Breach, 2014 Breach,
                   and Forged Cookie Breach are collectively referred to
                   as the "Yahoo Data Breaches" or "Data Breaches.""
                   without specification of the chronology
                           of the delayed announcements
                              about the details of Yahoo Data Breaches
                           within the Definition of the terms
                                  "Yahoo Data Breaches" and "Data Breaches."
                                        (with the final dot within the term), -
                       and hence within the definition of the term
                                                    "Data Breaches" too,
            linked to through item 1.15 of the Agreement 369-2 :
            "1.15 "Data Breaches" means the data breaches alleged
                   in the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
                   ("SAC") in the MDL Case, In re: Yahoo! Inc.
                   Customer Data Breach Security Litigation,
                   Case No. 16-md-02752-LHK (N.D. Cal.),
                   and in the CCAC in the JCCP Case,
                   Yahoo! Inc. Private Information Disclosure Cases,
                   JCCP No. 4895 (Orange County Superior Court)."
            vainly without specification of the definite footnote,
                   item and page of SAC in the Agreement 369-2 definition,
            as if the Parties have agreed within Agreement 369-2 beforehand
                  to abuse legal uncertainty
                  and to foresee the possibility of provocations
                  of the next delayed announcements,
                     not excluding the verbal announcements
                     at the final hearings, in Russian and/or other languages,
                     particularly of the fact that the term "Data Breaches."
                                         with the final dot inside the term
                     and the term "Yahoo Data Breaches"
                     were not used in the Agreement 369-2
                     and, to the contrary, the term "Data Breaches"
                             without the final dot inside the term -
                          yet was not defined consistently, properly and fully
                              by the definite Definition
                              with the unequivocal spelling and pronunciation
                          within the Definitions section of Agreement 369-2
                          without sharing the designation of Definitions
                                  with SAC's footnotes or items,
                     hence the Court was previously considering
                           the not defined subject of the litigation
                     until the UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTs
                           with the updated proper definition of the term
                           "Data Breaches", without the final dot, fit inside
                           the corresponding UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT fully,
                     will appear published at least in six languages
                          before expiration of the 5 year period (2015-2020)
                              of implementation of the Strategic Plan
                                 for Language Access in the California Courts
                     on the corresponding versions of Settlement Website
                     in accordance with the report (not plan or promise only)
                     in DECLARATION OF IMPLEMENTATION [at page 10] :
    "OFFICIAL SETTLEMENT WEBSITE
    42. Heffler created and is currently hosting a dedicated website
                          entitled www.YahooDataBreachSettlement.com.",
    "In addition, Heffler coordinated the translation of the Settlement
                               into Spanish, Russian, Hebrew and Arabic,
                               which were all posted in the website.",
    "The videos for the Account Holder Form, the Paid User Form,
                    the Small Business User Form and Israeli Form
     were all developed in English, Spanish, Russian, Hebrew and Arabic
              and posted to all versions of the website.";
    (4)
    and afterwards to suggest the Only Notice Expert,
                   not authorized for redefining the subject
                                      of the class litigation,
                   particularly to redefine the definition of the terms
                   "Yahoo Data Breaches" and "Data Breaches."
                               with the final dot within the term, -
        to strike out the words "(the "Data Breaches")"
                          in item 11 of the Chutzpah Declaration
           by single line
           and to add after the words crossed out
               the words "in contradiction to the definition of the terms
               "Yahoo Data Breaches" and "Data Breaches."
                           (with the final dot within the term)
               in footnote 2 at page 3 to item 6 at pages 2, 3
               in the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
                      (Document 387-4 Filed 07/11/19) : ",
               followed by the exact quote
               of the footnote 2 at page 3 to item 6 at pages 2, 3
                  in the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
                         (Document 387-4 Filed 07/11/19),
               followed, in its turn,
               by the exact requisites of this request, embraced in brackets;
    (5)
    and afterwards, taking in account that documents 388-1, 388-2, 388-3
                    do not contain the trick with excluding October 2017,
        to suggest the Only Notice Expert
        to copy attentively the words
           "were announced announced in September 2016,
            November 2016, December 2016, and October 2017,"
           from the Exhibit D to the Chutzpah Declaration
                    (a copy of the Publication Notice) [at page 71],
           or, alternatively, from the Exhibit 5C ("C" is uppercase)
                                       to the Agreement 369-2
               (Document 369-9 Filed 04/09/19),
                which could be referred to as "Publication"
                after fixing "c" in "Exhibit 5c" in Exhibit List section
                                 in Agreement 369-2
                      to uppercase
                      (followed by fixing "a" for Long Form Notice
                                      and "b" for Short Form Notice
                                   to uppercase),
                [at page 2]

        and to paste the block, obligatorily preserving the term
            "announced announced" as it seems helped, due to its
             higher judicial force than that of the term "announced",
             to avoid the replacement of "October 2017"
                                 with  "September 2017", -
            after the words
                  "were announced in September 2016, November 2016,
                                  December 2016, and September 2017,",
                   be crossed out by the single line,
            in Exhibit B (a copy of the Long Form Notice)
                    to the Chutzpah Declaration [at page 48] and
            in Exhibit C (a copy of the Short Form)
                    to the Chutzpah Declaration [at page 69];
    (6)
    and afterwards, not waiting for the immediate success
                                of the Only Notice Expert
                    in the first rounds of consequent exercises
                       on truthful presentation of information,
    in coordination with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
    Rule 23. Class Actions (c)(2)(B)
    "the court must direct to class members the best notice"
    and (e)(1)(B)
    "The court must direct notice in a reasonable manner to all class members"
    and
    Committee Notes on Rules-2018 Amendment
    "Subdivision (c)(2).
     Rule 23(e)(1) provides that the court must direct notice to the class
     regarding a proposed class-action settlement", -

    to direct by the Honorable Judge without delay
       the first best notice in a reasonable manner
       regarding a proposed class-action settlement
       to at least one human Pastuh,
                   has been identified  by Heffler
                    as the Settlement Class Member
                    as definitely as Heffler was able to identify at that time
                       in a second round of testing the Notice Program
                       under the pressure of different opinions
                       of (at least) the Yahoo Counsel,
                           the Only Notice Expert
                           and the Lead Settlement Class Counsel
                               thinking that he exercises disputes
                               in full at his discretion ultimately,

    because up to current date of registration of this request
            the putative Settlement Class Members
                         or an indefinite part of them
                         (regardless of the exposed number of them,
                          fraudulent and mocked in consequent Proposed Orders
                          but forced, simulated and teaching - in the Order 390)
                 were not notified legally and fully
                          by the Settlement Administrator,
                             nor by a settlement administrator,

    in relation with the fact that English language,
            or otherwise other preferable languages,
       still did not allow Heffler and the Only Notice Expert
                       and Mr. John A. Yanchunis and Yahoo Counsel
       to reach an agreement
                within the AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
                       together with its Exhibitions,
                       including the Chutzpah Declaration,
          while Heffler is aware of the content
                           of the UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT,
     
       particularly Heffler seems failed to explain
                                  to the Only Notice Expert
          that it would have been better for her
          to avoid consciously and voluntarily and purposefully
             relying on information being proposed to her
                        by Yahoo Counsel (as she specified
                        in item 11 of Chutzpah Declaration)
             and also on all sources of information
                      specified in item 1 of Chutzpah Declaration,
                 at least unless her personal knowledge
                          will begin correlating
                          with the text of official documents
                          and with public announcements of Heffler
                          and with the true part of her own
                                       Chutzpah Declaration
                          and with the DECLARATION OF IMPLEMENTATION
                          and with the reality, at the same time,

          and, instead, to study the same documents,
                        like UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT,
               which Heffler is relying on, most probably
                     with the preliminary approval by the Court,
                 but which Heffler yet can not publish
                             on the Settlement Website,
                 believing that it is better for Heffler
                   to rely on own CHUTSPAH than on Chutzpah Declaration,
                 but anyway gradually being reproduced in a form of
                        official documents, providing a possibility
                               to prove the facts before the courts
                                  and to make the agreed corrections
                                  of errors and tricks in official documents
                 thus targeting the guarantee of equal interpretation
                             by those readers who are not influenced
                             by information incoming from Yahoo Counsel
                             to the Only Notice Expert personally and privately
                             without the corresponding documents
                                     with definite sequences of words
                                                            published.

    Heffler failed to explain to Mr. John A. Yanchunis
                          and to the Only Notice Expert
    that Heffler will have to keep on the Administrator Website
                 the False Declaration, outdated,
                           without a word "Russian" in it,
                 instead of the evolving Chutzpah Declaration
         until the Only Notice Expert will learn
                        the Teaching of the Honorable Judge
                        on copying a significant fragment of text
                           from a one official document
                           and pasting it into another official document
                               with the exactness to a letter and a comma
                                                       and a digit,
          and, particularly, until the Only Notice Expert,
               having become not the only expert in copy-pasting,
               will copy the proper formulation of the criteria
                         of the Settlement Class certification
                         from the UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
                         having been already  quoted by Heffler
                                at the official site of Heffler,
                    to that time additionally improved in result of
                            directing the best notices by the Court
                            to e-mail addresses of HEBREWS,
               and will paste it, one and the same,
                        into all the corresponding Exhibitions
                           of the current Chutzpah Declaration
                           and of the DECLARATION OF IMPLEMENTATION,
                        containing the criteria formulations,
               in strict fulfillment of the Order 390,
                                     containing purposeful samples
                                         of accurate copy-pasting
                                         in full set of languages,
               followed by striking out, by a single line,
                    the variety of different criteria wording
                         in the original Chutzpah Declaration.
       
    Heffler failed to explain to Mr. John A. Yanchunis
                          and to the Only Notice Expert
    that the essential and primary subject of this litigation
         being considered by the Honorable Judge Lucy Haeran Koh,
                             not by Yahoo Counsel instead of a judge,
    is not the chronology of the Yahoo's announcements
                    within an arbitrary list of months,
    but the Yahoo Data Breaches (or the Data Breaches.) themselves
            regardless of the months of the publication
                          of the delayed related announcements,
    (regardless of the fact that the delays of the announcements
     may become a separate subject of consideration by the Court),

    and that, therefore,
        the words "and that were announced in September 2016,
                   November 2016, December 2016, and September 2017"
                   in item 11 of the Chutzpah Declaration [at pages 5, 6],
            inserted under the pretext of the significance of the excluding
                     of the announcement on October 3, 2017
                     regarding three (3) billion compromised accounts
                                                   existing worldwide
                     in sense of the holders of three (3) billion accounts,
                                    existing worldwide, resident WORLDWIDE,
                from the list of months dictated by Yahoo Council
                                        to the Only Notice Expert
                     via an unknown document in reply to an unknown request
                                                  of the Only Notice Expert
                     in addition to
                     the SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
                     (https://yahoodatabreachsettlement.com/en/Home/GetDocument/?documentName=Second%20Amended%20Consolidated%20Class%20Action%20Complaint.pdf
                      Document 387-4 Filed 07/11/19)
                     with multiple mentions
                          of the number "three billion" accounts
                                        and "3 billion" accounts,
                                                             
              for juggling a shammed number of compromised accounts holders
                           (up to 200 million unique U.S. and Israeli residents
                            holding approximately 900 million to one billion
                                                  Yahoo accounts)
                  fitting approximately in total population of the USA and Israel
                  on the date of the corresponding juggling -
           may explain the extinction of holders of three (3) billion
                                                 compromised accounts,
               having been documented by the words
               "2. What is this litigation about?",
               "In October 2017, it was announced that the 2013 Data Breach
                           had affected all Yahoo accounts then in existence,
                                      approximately 3 billion user accounts."
               [Chutzpah Declaration, page 54 (Exhibit B page 7)],
               having been sent to indefinite part of Settlement Class Members
                           from Yahoo's e-mail address
                           in contradiction to the UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT,
           from the Notice Program during the preceding period
                    of preliminary testing of the Notice Program in two rounds
                                   till July 18, 2020,

           but can not justify the excluding of holders
                                   of three (3) billion accounts
               from the next procedure of directing the best notices
                    by the Court, from the e-mail address of the Court,
                 to the victims of previous sending not the best
                    testing notifying messages from Yahoo e-mail address
                    (which were not
                     "an emailed notice from the settlement administrator"
                      as the Parties agreed in the UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT) -
           as soon as Heffler has failed to test the Notice Program fully;

    (7)
    Before directing the first best notice from the Court to Pastuh -
    it is necessary to add the words like
    "If you received an emailed Notice from the Court
                   about this class action settlement
                   addressed to your e-mail address,
     then the Court has already determined
              that you are a Settlement Class Member.
     (Paragraph added due to request <requisites of this request>.)"

    after the words
    "If you had a Yahoo account between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016,
     you are a settlement class member."

    The original words
    "If you received an emailed notice from the settlement administrator
                                about this class action settlement
                     addressed to you,
     then the settlement administrator has already determined
              that you are a settlement class member."
    should be changed to
    "If you received an emailed Notice from the Settlement Administrator
                                about this class action settlement
                     addressed to your e-mail address,
     then the Settlement Administrator has already determined
              that you are a Settlement Class Member."


    Naturally, Chutzpah disguised by the words like
    "if you are a resident of the United States or Israel"
    should not appear again in the UPDATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
    while "JURISDICTION AND VENUE" is supported in accordance with
    item 16 of the SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
    ( https://yahoodatabreachsettlement.com/en/Home/GetDocument/?documentName=Second%20Amended%20Consolidated%20Class%20Action%20Complaint.pdf )
    "16. This Court has jurisdiction over this action
         pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA"), 28 U.S.C.  1332(d),
         because the aggregate amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000,
         exclusive of interests and costs,
         there are more than 100 class members,
         and at least one class member is a citizen of a state
                                     different from Defendants
             and is a citizen of a foreign state.
         The Court also has supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims
         pursuant to 28 U.S.C.  1367."
    and the word "worldwide" is being carefully preserved in the Notices
            without the necessity to duplicate it to "worldwide worldwide"
                                                  or "WORLDWIDE WORLDWIDE".
       

    The first best Notice should be directed by the Court,
                          from the e-mail address of the Court,
    to the e-mail address of Pastuh.
    After the confirmation of successful receipt of the best Notice by Pastuh -
    the next Notice Plan fulfillment may be started
    with the same Only Notice Expert expanding her knowledge
             by experience of relying on official documents
                                         and the Law;
    (8)
    Integrity of Association SMF2+ suffered because of
    the different attitude of the Mediators of its Extensions,
                                  Settlement Class Members,
    to the prospect of surviving the consequences
            of the peculiarities of the Order 390.
    Some of Mediators are still waiting for the lawful best Notice.

    Unlike Pastuh,
    a lot of Mediators, who do not avoid registering
                                   in social networks,
             are still believing in a prospect of Teaching
             the Only Notice Expert
             ( linkedin.com/in/jeanne-finegan-apr-7112341b )
             and the Lead Settlement Class Counsel
             ( https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-yanchunis-736b1416 )
             and other attorneys of Plaintiffs and Defendants
             directly via LinkedIn -
             to arithmetic and to human logic
                           and to the Law of Evolution
                            of People Linked to the Unproved Sources,
    but mostly those Mediators do not have access to LinkedIn.com ,
                                           it is blocked for them,
                          something is wrong with Evolution there.
    Hence, a Teaching Executive Judge, as a Mediator, is still needed.

    In the meanwhile, in relation to
    {
    MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
    IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL
    (Document 414 Filed 01/31/20) [page 2] :
    "Ten months later, it was announced that the 2013 Breach affected
     all three billion existing worldwide accounts.",
    [page 13, 14]
    "Specifically, as anticipated, direct notice was achieved through email.
     The email campaign began on September 3, 2019,
                        with approximately 24.5 million emails sent.
     The email campaign continued for the next 19 business days
                                and ended on September 30, 2019.
     A total of 942,628,667 emails were attempted for delivery
     to Class Member email addresses on file,
     with 204,906,633 emails successfully delivered,
     a figure in line with Dr. Whipple's analysis. Finegan Decl.  11.",
    "A second round of email notice is also underway,
     having commenced on January 27, 2020,
            and to be completed on February 9, 2020,
     which will increase the delivered U.S. frequency to 3.5 times
                and Israeli frequency to 3.2 times. Id.  3, 3 n.1."
    },

    I am requesting the Honorable Judge
    to clarify, on the Court's request to the Only Notice Expert, -
    Why was a second round of directing email notices
              since January 27, 2020 till February 9, 2020
        needed ?
    Where are the rest of approximate three (3) billion accounts
          subtract 942,628,667 accounts attempted in the first round ?]
    How many e-mails were directed in a second round
    in addition to 942,628,667 attempts in the first round ?
    Wasn't it too short period since February 9, 2020 till March 6, 2020,
    in the Only Notice Expert's opinion,
    for getting acquainted with the messed restricted documents
        to compose reasonable objections or opt-outs
           by those Settlement Class Members (including PSEUDO-SHARPERs)
              who would have received the Notices
                  coordinated with the not existent Exhibit 5
                  specified in item 1.25 [at page 6] in the Agreement 369-2
              (from a settlement administrator
                    outside the definition "Settlement Administrator")
              with the word "Notice" with the uppercase "N"
                   in the e-mail subject or in the title in the e-mail body
              in a second round of email notice ?

    The editable original of this Translation
    from Russian into English
    of the extraction from the Transcribed text
    of the request originally in verbal form in Russian language
    is accessible, temporarily, via the link
    https://smf2.ga/index.php?msg=11240
    .

    Thank you.